Roadmap

Have something to say?

Tell us how we could make the product more useful to you.

In Progress

Trilio - bill based on number of backed up instances

We would like the option to bill based on the number of instances being backed up within a workload. Currently we can apply a price plan to the Trilio storage used or a workload being present; It would be useful to have the option to bill based on the number of instances being backed up (for example if a workload contains multiple instances). It may be possible to do this if we could filter instances based on the existence of a property as Trilio looks to add the workload details to the instance properties: "properties": { "workload_id": "c1b457e4-8bb7-42ad-a2af-ede3397b3f71", "workload_name": "workload-job-name" },

bens 4 days ago

🐛 Issues

UI links break when deployed under subpath

When OSIE frontend applications are deployed under a subpath, some generated links do not include the configured base path and may route incorrectly. Steps to Reproduce 1. Deploy OSIE admin under a subpath (e.g. /some-path) 2. Open the OSIE admin interface. 3. Navigate to a page that contains internal links (e.g. project links). 4. Click on one of those links. the application navigates to: /account/project/ not /some-path/account/project/

daadatwork-a11y 11 days ago

🐛 Issues

In Progress

Trilio Restore: Multi-Step Process

When restoring a Trilio Snapshot, a user is presented with One-Click, In-Place and Selective. This currently appears to not be implemented yet, but options are listed. Suggest removing the optional process (selective and in-place) until multi-step process integrated - leaving only One Click Restore. An additional step could be included to warn a user if the VMs exist in a backup set, that the One-Click restore will not work - One-Click is used to recover VMs that do not exist. You could always perform a selective restore instead, and enhance the user-journey to add more flexibility that Trilio’s own Horizon experience doesn’t yet have. One-Click restore takes defaults and is good for the immediate next action of restore. In-Place should prompt a user to select which volumes/disks to recover Selective restore allows the alteration of details, so requires another input screen where a user can restore individual VMs out of a group (say 1 or 2 out of 5), allows change of name, AZ, resize flavour, Re-IP, restore network, etc.

Kevin Jackson 15 days ago

1

🐛 Issues

In Progress

Trilio Snapshot Restore user journey: needs clarity of what you're restoring

Many users will just create backups with defaults. This creates backups (known and listed currently as Snapshots in Trilio) with the name “Snapshot”. When a user selects a snapshot to restore, the UI prioritises a lot of information that is largely irrelevant to the immediate action of perform the restore. User follows this journey: 1. Select Workload Select the snapshot from that workload UI changes to the Snapshot tab and prioritises a lot of information over the main possible action: restore. Even Delete is a tempting large option to do here. It should list the VMs this Snapshot is related to and will restore (along with the Workload name) Suggest making Restore and Mount clearer, prioritised actions. Delete should be a smaller detail. The information about the backup could be much smaller in UI real estate. The example below shows a default backup taken, I clicked on one of the Workloads, clicked on the Snapshot, and now I’m left wondering if I’ve selected the correct one. Without listing the VMs and the Workload it came from, it isn’t clear the action I should take.

Kevin Jackson 15 days ago

🐛 Issues

In Progress

Trilio VM Backup Hierarchy: Workloads->Snapshots (Backups) - Group by Workload Needed

For the Trilio Backup integration, the UI lists Workloads | Snapshots | Restores Snapshots are a child of Workloads. Having a Snapshot (Backup) list is great, but you need to group them under the workloads that created them. It would make the list more useful instead of a mix of potentially default named snapshots that give no indication what they’re a snapshot of. The example shows a list of snapshots that belong to the two example Workloads, but you can’t distinguish them in the list.

Kevin Jackson 15 days ago

🐛 Issues

Brackets on S3 bucket folder structure undeletable

We have a file path on an S3 bucket that contains [] in it and it cant be deleted. The error indicates it is not HTML encoded. I think they need to be [ %5B and ] %5D I was unable to delete the bucket in whole from the admin interface, so I impersonated the customer and tried to delete folder by folder within their bucket until I got this error.

jcornman 15 days ago

1

🐛 Issues

Planned

Set price plan via the API

When creating a new billing profile via the API, I can’t see a way to apply a price plan to it (we are using scoped price plans). It would be useful if we could: Get a list of price plans Apply a price plan to a billing profile Get the current price plan assigned to a billing profile Update/change the price plan assigned to a billing profile

bens 16 days ago

Enhancements

In Progress

Trilio selective restore

When restoring a snapshot, one of the options is selective. When attempting to do a selective restore via Osie it does not prompt for the details for the restore (via OpenStack this asks for which VMs to restore, sizing, placement etc.). Attempting a selective restore via Osie results in an error: Invalid restore options: 'instances' field is not in found in options['instances']

bens 19 days ago

🐛 Issues

Auto-Scaling

We need to have a concept of auto scaling and auto scaling groups in which user is able to define how and when his/her VM should scale up and down. the scaling should work for both vertical and horizontal scaling. user should get the options w.r.t to cpu usage and ram usage and disk usage with choice of image, network, ssh-key, naming convention etc. i may have missed something, you can add into it

cloud 30 days ago

1

Enhancements

Fields on Bills

When viewing a bill it would be useful if we could display a breakdown to show how the resource charge was calculated. This would ideally be based on the rule in the price plan that generated it. For example: Currently the bill shows the resource type ‘instance’ with name ‘server1’ and price ‘£25’ If updated the bill would show each charge associated with that instance i.e. memory, root_disk etc. as separate items referencing the pricing rule which generated the charge charge name ‘instance cpu’, resource type ‘instance’, name ‘server1’ and price £15 charge name ‘instance memory’ resource type ‘instance’, name ‘server1’ and price £5 charge name ‘instance disk’ resource type ‘instance’, name ‘server1’ and price £5 It would also be useful to have the project as a column to show which project the resource belongs to.

bens about 1 month ago

Enhancements